This paper explores the intersection of neurodivergent inclusion and labor market evolution, focusing on the comparative economic impacts of participation in gig-based versus traditional employment. Despite growing awareness of neurodiversity, systemic underutilization persists in both employment models. We evaluate how gig work offers flexibility suited to certain neurodivergent strengths, yet often lacks the stability and protections needed for long-term socioeconomic mobility. The paper leverages economic modeling, behavioral labor theory and investor risk analysis to demonstrate how the current structure of workforce inclusion undermines potential GDP growth and long-term labor resilience. Recommendations are made for policymakers and investors to recalibrate strategies toward inclusive innovation, human capital development, and sustainable employment design.