This paper analyses the Battle of Khanwa (1527) by examining how Mughal writers presented and biased the event's history. Though the Battle of Khanwa played an essential role in the early days of the Mughal Empire, Babur and Abu'l-Fazl portray it in a biased way. The study seeks to discover how Mughal historians told a version of history that made the Mughal Empire seem legitimate and Babur's victory seem unavoidable. By studying previous works like the Baburnama and Akbarnama, the paper examines how Mughals and European writers described the same events, ensuring imperial messages were heard. The Mughal accounts blame the Rajputs' resistance on politics inside their ranks and their lack of substantial military numbers. The paper concludes by pointing out what these biases mean for studying Mughal history and lists some future topics to consider, including local accounts and other perspectives on the battle.