ISO 9001:2015

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RESEARCH INNOVATIONS & TECHNOLOGY (IJGRIT) [ Vol. 4 | No. 1 | January - March, 2026 ]

Study of Stable and Efficient Photoelectrode for Photo-Electrochemical Splitting of Water

Hariom Jaimini, Lal Chand Yadav, R.C. Meena & S.L. Meena

One method that shows promise for producing hydrogen more easily and sustainably is photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting. PEC-based hydrogen generation solves the issue of solar persistency and offers a sustainable and environmentally friendly energy source. Despite significant attempts over the past few decades, no solar water splitting material has yet to meet the requirements of high efficiency, long-term stability, and affordability. The photoelectrode materials used in PEC must have band edge potentials at the surfaces, long-term stability against corrosion in the aqueous electrolyte, and enough voltage upon irradiation to split water. The oxygen and hydrogen evolution reaction are required for the charge transfer from the semiconductor's surface to the electrolyte. The most promising semiconductor materials are photocatalysts like TiO2, WO3, Fe2O3, Cu2O, etc., because of their appropriate band gap and valance band structure. However, charge separation and conveyance are the main issues with PEC water splitting. The efficiency of the PEC process is increased by a number of techniques, including morphological control, defect introduction, heterojunction construction, and co-catalyst loading. The energy gap of n-type cuprous oxide (Cu2O), which absorbs visible light up to a wavelength of 600 nm, makes it a suitable material for photocatalysis. Cu2O's thickness is important as a photoelectrode since an incorrect thickness could deteriorate its photocatalytic qualities. By adjusting the Cu2O thickness, this work sought to improve the photocatalytic capabilities of Cu2O electrodeposited on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO), or Cu2O/FTO. Cu2O/FTO electrochemical deposition allowed for the control of Cu2O thickness by varying the deposition duration. Cu2O's morphology altered from a leaf-like shape to an irregular facet shape with highly dense coverage when the deposition duration was varied from 8 to 40 minutes. The average thickness also rose from 450 to 1050 nm. Cu2O/FTO achieved the highest photocurrent (150 and 158 µA under irradiation of 450 and 570 nm, respectively) at a thickness of 900 nm because of its extremely dense morphology and high absorption. Additionally, the charge diffusion was still good at a thickness of 900 nm. Further, the increase of Cu2O film thickness higher than 900 nm caused low photocatalytic properties even though the morphology was highly dense, and the absorption was the highest. This state might result from Cu2O's comparatively too high resistance, which led to inadequate charge dispersion.

  1. Pan, L., Liu, Y., Yao, L., Ren, D., Sivula, K., Grätzel, M., & Hagfeldt, A. (2020). Title not provided. Nature Communications, 11, 1.
  2. Tabish, A., Varghese, A. M., Wahab, M. A., & Karanikolos, G. N. (2020). Title not provided. Catalysts, 10, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10010095
  3. Fujishima, A., & Honda, K. (1972). Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature, 238, 37–38.
  4. Salomão, P. E. A., Barbosa, L. R. S., Andrade, T. S., Ferreira, E. J. C., & Pereira, M. C. (2019). Title not provided. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 54, 28603.
  5. Bhatt, M. D., & Lee, J. S. (2015). Title not provided. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 3, 10632.
  6. Grätzel, M. (1981). Title not provided. Accounts of Chemical Research, 14, 376.
  7. Yang, L., Zhou, H., Fan, T., & Zhang, D. (2020). Title not provided. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CP00246F
  8. Lin, L., Hisatomi, T., Chen, S., Takata, T., & Domen, K. (2020). Visible-light-driven photocatalytic water splitting: Recent progress and challenges. Trends in Chemistry, 2, 813–824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trechm.2020.06.006
  9. Nazim, M., Khan, A. A. P., Asiri, A. M., & Kim, J. H. (2021). Exploring rapid photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants with porous CuO nanosheets. ACS Omega, 6, 2601–2612. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c04747
  10. Khasanah, R. A. N., Lin, H.-C., Ho, H.-Y., Peng, Y.-P., Lim, T.-S., Hsiao, H.-L., Wang, C.-R., Chuang, M.-C., & Chien, F. S.-S. (2021). Substrate-dependent photocatalytic properties of Cu?O heterojunctions. RSC Advances, 11, 4935–4941. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA10681J
  11. Laidoudi, S., Bioud, A. Y., Azizi, A., Schmerber, G., Bartringer, J., Barre, S., & Dinia, A. (2013). Growth and characterization of electrodeposited Cu?O thin films. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 28, 115005. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/28/11/115005
  12. Khasanah, R. A. N., Lin, H.-C., Ho, H.-Y., Peng, Y.-P., Hsiao, H.-L., Wang, C.-R., & Chien, F. S.-S. (2022). Photoelectrocatalytic hydrolysis of ammonia borane by electrodeposited Cu?O. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47, 11203–11210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.167
  13. Koiki, B. A., & Arotiba, O. A. (2020). Cu?O as an emerging semiconductor in photocatalysis: A review. RSC Advances, 10, 36514–36525. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA06858F
  14. Hossain, M. A., Al-Gaashani, R., Hamoudi, H., Al Marri, M. J., Hussein, I. A., Belaidi, A., Merzougui, B. A., Alharbi, F. H., & Tabet, N. (2017). Controlled growth of Cu?O thin films by electrodeposition. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing, 63, 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.02.012
  15. Bagal, I. V., Chodankar, N. R., Hassan, M. A., Waseem, A., Johar, M. A., Kim, D.-H., & Ryu, S.-W. (2019). Cu?O as an emerging photocathode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44, 21351–21378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.06.184
  16. Son, M.-K. (2021). Large-scale Cu?O photocathodes design. Energies, 14, 7422. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217422
  17. McShane, C. M., & Choi, K.-S. (2009). Photocurrent enhancement of Cu?O electrodes. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 131, 2561–2569. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja806370s
  18. Chen, Y.-C., Chen, Y.-J., Dong, P.-H., & Hsu, Y.-K. (2020). Photoelectrochemical water splitting by Cu?O. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 3, 1373–1380. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b01781
  19. Khasanah, R. A. N., Lee, C.-H., Li, Y. C., Chen, C.-H., Lim, T.-S., Wang, C.-R., Chang, P.-Y., Sheu, H.-S., & Chien, F. S.-S. (2022). Enhancement of photocatalytic activity of Cu?O. ACS Applied Energy Materials, 5, 15326–15332. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c02963
  20. Dolai, S., Das, S., Hussain, S., Bhar, R., & Pal, A. K. (2017). Cu?O thin films by sputtering. Vacuum, 141, 296–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.04.033
  21. Karapetyan, A., Reymers, A., Giorgio, S., Fauquet, C., Sajti, L., Nitsche, S., Nersesyan, M., Gevorgyan, V., & Marine, W. (2015). Cu?O thin films by thermal oxidation. Journal of Luminescence, 159, 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlumin.2014.10.058
  22. Saadaldin, N., Alsloum, M. N., & Hussain, N. (2015). Copper oxides thin films by CBD. Energy Procedia, 74, 1459–1465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.794
  23. Abdelfatah, M., Ledig, J., El-Shaer, A., Sharafeev, A., Lemmens, P., Mosaad, M. M., Waag, A., & Bakin, A. (2016). Electrodeposition modes effect on Cu?O solar cells. ECS Journal of Solid State Science and Technology, 5, Q183–Q187. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0191606jss
  24. Rahal, H., Kihal, R., Affoune, A. M., & Rahal, S. (2020). Effect of pH on Cu?O thin films. Journal of Electronic Materials, 49, 4385–4391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-020-08093-y
  25. Mohd Hanif, A. S., Azmal, S. A., Ahmad, M. K., & Mohamad, F. (2015). Effect of deposition time on Cu?O films. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 773, 677–681. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.677
  26. Kalubowila, K. D. R. N., Gunawardhana, L. K. A. D. D. S., Wijesundera, R. P., & Siripala, W. (2014). Improving photoconductivity of Cu?O films. Semiconductor Science and Technology, 29, 075012. https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/29/7/075012
  27. Camera-Roda, G., & Santarelli, F. (2007). Optimization of photocatalytic film thickness. Catalysis Today, 129, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.06.062
  28. Osorio-Aguilar, D. M., et al. (2023). Adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue. Catalysts, 13, 1480. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13121480
  29. Qi, G., Liu, M., Tang, C., Chang, J., Yang, C., Liu, F., Ning, X., & Yang, Y. (2021). Conductivity control of Cu?O films. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46, 2878–2889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.04.176
  30. Ait Hssi, A., et al. (2020). Optical properties of Cu?O films. Materials Research Express, 7, 016424. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab6772
  31. Yang, Y., Han, J., Ning, X., Cao, W., Xu, W., & Guo, L. (2014). Morphology control of Cu?O films. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 6, 22534–22543. https://doi.org/10.1021/am506657v
  32. Yu, X., Tang, X., Li, J., Zhang, J., Kou, S., Zhao, J., & Yao, B. (2017). Nucleation of Cu?O films. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 164, D999–D1005. https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1081714jes
  33. Brandt, I. S., et al. (2015). Substrate effects in Cu?O electrodeposition. Journal of Applied Physics, 118, 145303. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932642
  34. Wang, P., Wu, H., Tang, Y., Amal, R., & Ng, Y. H. (2015). Cu?O photoelectrodes. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 119, 26275–26282. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b07276
  35. Taher, S. J., Barzinjy, A. A., & Hamad, S. M. (2020). Deposition time effect on Cu?O nanocubes. Journal of Electronic Materials, 49, 7532–7540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-020-08495-y
  36. Benz, J., Hering, K. P., Kramm, B., Polity, A., Klar, P. J., Siah, S. C., & Buonassisi, T. (2017). Nitrogen doping in Cu?O. Physica Status Solidi B, 254, 1600421. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201600421
  37. Chen, A., Long, H., Li, X., Li, Y., Yang, G., & Lu, P. (2009). Growth of Cu?O and CuO films. Vacuum, 83, 927–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2008.10.003.

DOI:

Article DOI:

DOI URL:


Download Full Paper:

Download