ISO 9001:2015

International Journal of Innovations & Research Analysis (IJIRA) [ Vol. 6 | No. 2(II) | April - June, 2026 ]

Digitalisation and Indigenous Rights in India: Issues, Challenges and the Niyamgir Experience

Dr. Arun Ray

Digitalisation has become a central pillar of governance, service delivery, economic inclusion and social transformation in contemporary India. This paper explores the intersection of digitalisation and indigenous rights in India, focussing on how Digital transformation interacts with tribal communities’ access to technology, governance and rights protection. While national initiatives such as Digital India and the expansion of digital public infrastructure (DPI) promise greater access to services, infrastructure, and markets, Indigenisation communities (Aadivasi) particularly those residing in remote regions like Odisha, face structural challenges, including digital exclusion, linguistic barriers, socio-economic stratification and threats to community rights. The Niyamgir movement in odisha illustrates these broader challenges. Although this case is primarily a land and cultural rights struggle, it highlights how marginalised communities can leverage participatory rights and how digital exclusion can compound broader injustice. This paper argues that for digitalisation to support indigenous rights, policies must prioritise inclusive infrastructure, Indigenous language content, digital literacy and community-based data governance framework.

  1. Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press.
  2. Baviskar, A. (2011). What the eye does not see: The Yamuna in the imagination of Delhi. Economic and Political Weekly, 46(50), 45–53.
  3. Béteille, A. (2012). Democracy and institutions. Oxford University Press.
  4. Economic Times. (2018). Niyamgiri: The story of one of the biggest land conflicts—No mine now, but is it all fine on Niyam Hills?
    https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/indl-goods/svs/metals-mining/theres-no-mine-but-is-it-all-fine-on-niyam-hills/articleshow/63763978.cms
  5. Government of India. (2006). The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act, 2006. Ministry of Law and Justice.
  6. Government of India. (2015). Digital India: Programme overview. Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
  7. IAS Express. (2025). Niyamgiri movement: Importance of the FPIC concept. https://iasexpress.net/niyamgiri-movement-importance-of-the-fpic-concept/
  8. IJFMR. (2024). Study on digital divide among Kondh tribal people of Odisha. https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/2/16533.pdf
  9. IJRAR. (2023). Bridging digital divide gap among tribal communities. https://ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR23A1922.pdf
  10. Malik, S. (2022). Digital divide and the Scheduled Tribes in India. Social and Political Research Foundation. https://sprf.in
  11. Mallick, B. (2022). Digital divide and social exclusion in tribal regions of India. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 24(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-021-00163-5
  12. Ministry of Tribal Affairs. (2019). Digital India e-governance initiative for tribal empowerment. https://www.researchgate.net
  13. Mohanty, B. B. (2010). Development, displacement and rehabilitation: Issues for national debate. Sage Publications.
  14. Nielsen, K., & Sundar, N. (2014). Law, struggle and land rights in India: The Niyamgiri case. Journal of Peasant Studies, 41(5), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2014.933635
  15. Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd. v. Ministry of Environment & Forests & Others, (2013) 6 SCC 476 (Supreme Court of India).
  16. Participedia. (2025). Indigenous political assertion on Niyamgiri Hills.

https://participedia.net/case/12524

  1. Pati, J. (2014). The Niyamgiri movement and the question of indigenous rights. Economic and Political Weekly, 49(21), 58–65.
  2. Press Information Bureau. (2025, December 12). Digital India Programme bridging the urban–rural divide. https://pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2202905
  3. Ritimo. (2025). Claiming Niyamgiri: The Dongria Kondh’s struggle against Vedanta. https://www.ritimo.org
  4. Roberts, J. S., & Montoya, L. N. (2023). In consideration of indigenous data sovereignty: Data mining as a colonial practice. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.10215
  5. Roy, A. (2019). Digital governance and marginal communities in India. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 65(3), 412–426.
  6. Saxena, N. C., Parasuraman, S., Kant, A., Baviskar, A., & Rao, M. G. (2010). Report of the four-member committee for investigation of the proposal submitted by the Orissa Mining Corporation for mining in Niyamgiri. Ministry of Environment and Forests.
  7. Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. Harvard University Press.
  8. Singh, K. S. (1993). The Scheduled Tribes. Oxford University Press.
  9. Sundar, N. (2016). The burning forest: India’s war in Bastar. Juggernaut Books.
  10. United Nations. (2007). United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations General Assembly.

DOI:

Article DOI:

DOI URL:


Download Full Paper:

Download