ISO 9001:2015

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN COMMERCE, MANAGEMENT & SOCIAL SCIENCE (IJARCMSS) [ Vol. 9 | No. 2 (II) | April - June, 2026 ]

Impact of AI-Driven Talent Acquisition on Recruitment Cost Efficiency and Quality of Hire

Asha Jain & Nikita Yadav

Artificial intelligence (AI) has found its way into talent acquisition, where it is used in automating sourcing, parsing resumes, matching candidates, using chatbots, analysing assessment scores, scheduling interviews and predictive decision making. While these technologies hold the potential of reducing recruitment expenses and enhancing quality of hire, there are various conditions necessary for their effectiveness: Data validity, process integration, Recruiter oversight, Ethical governance and Post hire measurement. This paper explores how AI is influencing two critical indicators for successful recruitment: recruitment cost efficiency and quality of hire. The paper then uses a conceptual literature synthesis to create an integrated framework that links AI capabilities to cost drivers, decision quality, candidate experience and long term employee outcomes. The analysis suggests that AI can help decrease administrative workload, time-to-fill, enhance pipeline conversion, and assist in skillsbased matching. But cost savings are likely to be exaggerated if implementation, integration, audit, vendor and compliance costs are not considered. Likewise, quality of hire does not occur automatically, it’s a process that involves having job-relevant features validated, regular human review, bias tracking, and feedback through post-hire performance and retention data. The paper presents a measurement model, risk-control matrix, and recommendations for implementation for organizations aiming to leverage AI in recruitment while ensuring fairness, transparency, and strategic alignment.

Jain, A. & Yadav, N. (2026). Impact of AI-Driven Talent Acquisition on Recruitment Cost Efficiency and Quality of Hire. International Journal of Advanced Research in Commerce, Management & Social Science, 09(02(II)), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.62823/IJARCMSS/9.2(II).9107
  1. Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial intelligence in human resources management: Challenges and a path forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15-42.
  2. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619867910
  3. Raghavan, M., Barocas, S., Kleinberg, J., & Levy, K. (2020). Mitigating bias in algorithmic hiring: Evaluating claims and practices. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 469-481). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372828
  4. Bogen, M., & Rieke, A. (2018). Help wanted: An examination of hiring algorithms, equity, and bias. Upturn.
  5. Fabris, A., Baranowska, N., Dennis, M. J., Graus, D., Hacker, P., Saldivar, J., Zuiderveen Borgesius, F., & Biega, A. J. (2025). Fairness and bias in algorithmic hiring: A multidisciplinary survey. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3696457
  6. LinkedIn Talent Solutions. (2025). The future of recruiting 2025: How AI redefines recruiting excellence. LinkedIn.
  7. Bone, M., Ehlinger, E., & Stephany, F. (2023). Skills or degree? The rise of skill-based hiring for AI and green jobs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11942.
  8. Aka, A., Palikot, E., Ansari, A., & Yazdani, N. (2025). Better together: Quantifying the benefits of AI-assisted recruitment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.08029.
  9. Slaykovskiy, V., Zvegintsev, M., Sakhonchyk, Y., & Ajamian, H. (2025). Evaluating AI recruitment sourcing tools by human preference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.02463.
  10. National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1.
  11. European Commission. (2024). AI Act: Regulatory framework for artificial intelligence. European Union.
  12. New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection. (2026). Automated employment decision tools. NYC DCWP.
  13. Bersin, J. (2025). Maximizing the impact of AI on talent solutions. The Josh Bersin Company.
  14. West, S. M., Whittaker, M., & Crawford, K. (2019). Discriminating systems: Gender, race, and power in AI. AI Now Institute.
  15. Kleinberg, J., & Raghavan, M. (2021). Algorithmic monoculture and social welfare. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(22), e2018340118.
  16. Groves, L., Metcalf, J., Kennedy, A., Vecchione, B., & Strait, A. (2024). Auditing work: Exploring the New York City algorithmic bias audit regime. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.08101.

DOI:

Article DOI: 10.62823/IJARCMSS/9.2(II).9107

DOI URL: https://doi.org/10.62823/IJARCMSS/9.2(II).9107


Download Full Paper:

Download