The modern educational landscape demands a paradigm shift from traditional, teacher-centered instruction to dynamic, student-centric methodologies. This paper evaluates a multi-faceted approach to innovation in teaching, incorporating psychological, Socratic, technological, and experiential frameworks. By analyzing the intersection of cognitive science and classroom instruction, this study demonstrates how innovative practices significantly improve learner engagement, critical thinking, and holistic character development. The findings advocate for a systemic integration of these practices to cultivate resilient, lifelong learners.
Thorat, V. (2026). Transforming Pedagogy through Innovation. Journal of Modern Management & Entrepreneurship, 16(02), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.62823/JMME/16.02.9167
- Bates, A. W. (2022). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning (3rd ed.). Tony Bates Associates. https://pressbooks.bccampus.ca/teachinginadigitalagev3m
- Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academies Press.
- Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
- Mayer, R. E. (2021). Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
- Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
- Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
- Westwood, P. (2018). What teachers need to know about teaching methods. ACER Press.
- Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
